Sharks front office

The trade chessboard: what every chip is worth, and what the plan actually costs

GS
Grab Some PineJun 10, 20266 min read
Every call on this site goes on a public ledger and gets graded. The misses stay up.

Every trade conversation we have had this offseason has been one-at-a-time: would you do Bystedt for this, Mukhamadullin for that, the 20 for Hronek. That is how fans argue. A GM does not price chips one at a time; he keeps a board where every asset has a value, a decay rate, and a job, and he never pays with a bigger bill than the purchase requires. So here is the whole board at once, with the prices anchored to actual reported comps instead of vibes, and the punchline at the end about what the blue-line plan really costs. It is less than you think, and that is the whole point.

The chip board#

DenominationChipWhat it buysThe catch
The $100 billWilliam EklundA true top-four RHD with term, by himselfYou should not spend it (see below)
The $50Quentin MustyHeadlines a package for a real top-four RHDBoom-or-bust; only spend for a defenseman with term
The $50 that expiresThe No. 20 pickThe other half of any big packageConverts to a non-liquid prospect on June 27; below-average class from No. 6 on tilts it toward trade
The $20Filip BystedtGets a defenseman deal over the line; never starts oneMelting: one ELC year left, value peaked now
The contested $20Shakir MukhamadullinA one-for-one change-of-scenery swap (Kesselring)Re-opened: he was Orlov's best partner by xG; may be worth more kept
Pocket changeCOL 2nd, the 4ths, Dellandrea, Kurashev, Halttunen, Lund, CardwellSweeteners and value-balancersHalttunen is the one appreciating; the rest are flat or fading
The wild cardTyler ToffoliReal deadline value if the season soursHold per the plan: productive, reasonable term, full NTC anyway
The vault (not for sale)Celebrini, Smith, Misa, Dickinson, Chernyshov, Graf, Askarov, Ravensbergen, Pohlkamp, Cagnoni, the No. 2 pickNothing, because they are the teamThe day you spend the vault, the rebuild is over, one way or the other

On the $100 bill, one paragraph, because it keeps coming up. Eklund is the only movable Shark who fetches a legitimate top-four right-shot defenseman straight up. He is also the team's most underpaid market contract ($5.6M against a $7M-to-$7.75M comp band) and the play-driver the second line is built around. Trading your best-value contract to fix the blue line is paying for the renovation by selling the furnace. The Stephens trade-chip framing exists because the forward depth makes him movable on paper; movable is not the same as spendable. He stays in the wallet.

The price list, anchored to real comps#

These are not invented numbers. Every line below is anchored to a reported offer, an executed trade, or the valuation tiers already in the file:

Target (all RHD)Realistic priceAnchorVerdict
Kesselring (BUF)Mukhamadullin, one-for-oneChange-of-scenery swaps; he was a healthy scratchThe plan's move
Dougie Hamilton (NJD)Cap absorption plus a mid-round pickNJ needs the $9M off to re-sign Gritsyuk and NemecThe Carlson fallback, cheap
Hronek (VAN)No. 20 + Bystedt, ceilingWeegar went for three 2nds; Andersson for a late 1st + 2nd + depth; he is that tier, not Dobson'sOnly at that price; walk above it
Nemec (NJD)No. 20 + a little, or Bystedt + a 2ndJiricek cost a 1st+2nd+3rd+4th, then flipped for Bobby Brink a year laterBuyer beware; never Eklund
Schneider (NYR)A 2nd plus depth, no moreDesharnais, the same role, cost a 5thKick tires only
Ristolainen (PHI)Mukhamadullin + a mid pick31-year-old on $5.1M x 2; Philly moving onFallback if Kesselring dies
Parayko (STL)A 1st + a top prospectBuffalo reportedly offered its 1st plus Mrtka and got nixedToo rich for a 33-year-old; pass
Werenski / Fox tierMusty + No. 20 + more, possibly the No. 2Star-D market; the Quinn Hughes precedentWrong year; this is the 2028 deadline's move

The chips are ice cubes, and they melt at different speeds#

The board is not static, and the decay rates are half the strategy:

The reality check: what the blue-line plan actually costs#

The entire blue-line plan costs one contested $20 bill and a pile of cap space.

Walk the transactions: Reid costs the No. 2 pick you were always spending. Carlson costs money. Desharnais costs money. Kesselring costs Mukhamadullin, maybe, and if that fork closes, the fallback (Hamilton for cap absorption, or Murphy for $3.6M) costs even less. The $100, the $50, the expiring $50, and the $20 all stay on the table. That is not timidity, it is sequencing: the contention clock says the big chips exist for a specific future purchase, the deadline star (the franchise-D luxury or the Star Forward gap) you buy in 2028 or 2029 once the window is open and you know exactly what is missing. The worst version of this summer is the one where Musty, Bystedt, and the 20 all go out the door for a 28-year-old number-three defenseman two years before the team is ready to cash that kind of check. The board exists so the wallet opens in the right order: money now, change-of-scenery now, the melting $20 if a real deal calls for it, and the big bills when the clock says go.

Chip valuations and target prices anchored to the repo's filed comps: the Hronek tier framework (Weegar/Andersson vs Dobson), Buffalo's reported Parayko offer (1st + Mrtka), the Jiricek precedent, Sherwood (two 2nds) and Desharnais (a 5th) acquisition costs, Professor Hockey's chip tiers (Bystedt and Musty B-tier, June 2026 top-10), and the deep-dives at docs/players/Bystedt... and docs/players/Musty.... Mukhamadullin fork per the June 8 Orlov pairing data. Trade values are tier estimates, not quotes; the market sets the final number.

Filed under Sharks

More in The Cap Sheet

The whole thread →
Re-judging the Eklund trade: the data says they sold a rising player at the bottom of his luck
Sharks Player Note

Re-judging the Eklund trade: the data says they sold a rising player at the bottom of his luck

How good was Eklund, really, and what that does to the trade grade

Grab Some PineJun 25, 20265 min read
FREE AGENCY TARGET BOARDAndersson or Carlson,not bothgrabsomepine.comsharks
Free Agency Target Board

Top 5 free-agent D to target: Andersson is the prize, and the right-shot well is shallow behind him

Five free-agent D to chase, and the honest truth about how thin it is

Grab Some PineJun 25, 20266 min read
The salary floor after Eklund: $21M the Sharks are required to spend, not free to spend
Sharks Cap Note

The salary floor after Eklund: $21M the Sharks are required to spend, not free to spend

The floor, not the ceiling, is the Sharks' real number

Grab Some PineJun 24, 20267 min read

Latest on the Sharks

The whole beat →
San Jose's first regulation win was even at five-on-five until it led by two
Post-game

San Jose's first regulation win was even at five-on-five until it led by two

San Jose built its first regulation win on special teams and a 78-second burst, with most of Ottawa's shots arriving as it chased a multi-goal deficit.

Dom CahillOct 23, 20264 min read
Stenberg had a hand in five of San Jose's last six power-play goals
Player deep dive

Stenberg had a hand in five of San Jose's last six power-play goals

Five games after the first look, Stenberg's points all come on the power play, his five-on-five minutes have shrunk, and his top speed has moved from the bottom fifth of the league to the middle.

Dom CahillOct 22, 20265 min read
Misa is shooting again, and the gap between him and his team has grown
Player deep dive

Misa is shooting again, and the gap between him and his team has grown

Michael Misa's starts and shooting recovered, while San Jose's chance share improved much further without him.

Dom CahillOct 21, 20265 min read

Earlier on the Sharks

Almost Half Of Dmitry Orlov's Points Came On A Power Play He Is Projected To Lose
Season preview

Almost Half Of Dmitry Orlov's Points Came On A Power Play He Is Projected To Lose

Dmitry Orlov scored 37 points in 82 games last season, a career high in his fifteenth NHL year, and 18 of them came on the power play against a previous career best of eight. At even strength he had 19, the fewest of any full season he has played apart from his rookie year. He is 35, he is in the final season of a two-year deal at $6,500,000, and both published opening-night power-play projections put Luca Cagnoni at the point and leave Orlov off both units.

Dom CahillSep 2, 20266 min read
Macklin Celebrini Explained His Own Contract By Talking About Everybody Else's
The extension

Macklin Celebrini Explained His Own Contract By Talking About Everybody Else's

Macklin Celebrini's first media availability since his five-year, $94 million extension. He explained the number, the timing and the term, and all three explanations were about San Jose's flexibility rather than his own market. The context underneath them is a June meeting his agent Pat Brisson requested with owner Hasso Plattner and general manager Mike Grier, reported in July, about the direction of the franchise.

Grant LombardAug 28, 20264 min read
The Toffoli–Misa–Graf Line: Sixty-Seven Minutes, Sixty Percent, Zero Goals Against
Analysis

The Toffoli–Misa–Graf Line: Sixty-Seven Minutes, Sixty Percent, Zero Goals Against

The 2025-26 Sharks ran out a dozen different forward combinations around Michael Misa. Nine games and sixty-seven minutes of one specific configuration produced the best per-minute

Grab Some PineMay 14, 202612 min read